In all honesty, it was difficult for me to invest myself into
the project and in our neighborhood during the initial analysis. Part of me can
blame only documenting the physical and environmental aspects of the site,
while the other piece was confused on where to direct the focus of design. Who
was the primary focus of all of the gathered information supposed to be aimed
towards? The history team did a wonderful job of arguing and supporting the
case for the surrounding neighborhood. Housing seemed to be pushing for the
interests of MCRA while homelessness analyzed through the lens St. Vincent de
Paul’s. And while these three groups may not have expressed keen interest in
food systems, our professors guided the last programming group into the
discovery of the local food deserts. In essence, there were four different
groups, not contradicting, but contending for consideration in design; all of
which warranted a thorough review.
While our approach to our investigation was justified,
communication between the overall group of students was extremely complicated.
No one was truly aware of what each group was tasked with and as result, a lot
of overlapping of responsibilities occurred. One physical instance of this
problem was our presence on the site during Mid City Speaks. There were too
many people vying for the attention of the residents, and consequently I am
afraid that our overwhelming presence may have been intimidating. A simple
solution to this for the future may be to separate the class into groups that
can come to the event in waves, decreasing the total number of students at one
time but increasing the possibilities for one on one interaction.
Moving on from analysis and criticism, we are left with a question
to take forward: What is important for the neighborhood and its residents?
Simply put, the answers are to increase safety, create an area for children to
go after school, a space for workforce development, and a grocery store.
Although these answers may be simple by themselves, together they create
somewhat of a conflict of interest between the neighborhood consumers and the business
patrons. However, moving forward, this instills a welcome challenge of how to
remedy complex desires through design.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please leave comments here...